Apple: Strong Hardware, Lagging AI Leadership

Apple has experienced a turbulent few years, particularly with its AI endeavors like “Apple Intelligence,” which lag behind industry leaders in both model development and product capabilities. Apple’s infrastructure and on-device AI are relatively basic, and it does not operate a foundational model of its own. However, its saving grace is that AI does not currently pose a direct threat to its core hardware business.

Apple’s strength lies in its tightly integrated ecosystem and consumer reach. Although Apple is not leading the AI race, it has an edge in delivering user-friendly AI experiences through iPhones, Macs, and Apple Watches. Its unique access to private consumer data also positions it well for building effective, individualized AI systems.

Despite its lag in AI models, Apple has started to strengthen ties with OpenAI, integrating their capabilities into iOS 26. This partnership could be pivotal. Apple’s future AI success could come from creating superior hardware platforms for dominant AI services like ChatGPT. The company could expand beyond phones—into smart wearables, glasses, and home automation—with Apple’s known strength in hardware scalability and design.

One challenge Apple faces is its traditional belief in owning both software and hardware. To evolve, Apple might need to accept partnerships (and the loss of control they entail) or make major acquisitions—like buying the open-source-focused AI company Mistral—to build up its AI credentials internally. Whichever route Apple takes, it must act decisively to remain competitive.

Google: Infrastructure Leader, Disruption Risk

Google remains a top-tier AI infrastructure player. It boasts end-to-end integration from chips (TPUs) to models (Gemini) and cloud platforms. Gemini leads in model context size and affordability, though adoption lags behind rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic.

Google’s unparalleled strength is its data advantage—drawing on YouTube, web indexing, scanned books, and academic research to train its models. It also dominates distribution channels through Android, Search, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). However, the real challenge lies in Google’s core business: Search.

Generative AI threatens Google’s Search-based revenue model. While the company has responded with innovations like AI Search Overviews and the Search Funnel (which aims to modernize search without abandoning ads), this transition is not without risk. Chatbots could eventually replace or heavily disrupt traditional search.

Still, Google’s cloud business offers a promising escape route. GCP can attract enterprise clients looking for high-performance AI infrastructure, especially since Google offers strong models and pricing without needing to safeguard legacy ad revenues.

Yet a persistent concern remains: Can Google turn all this technical strength into great consumer products? That’s the next hurdle the company must clear.

Meta: Caught Between AI Opportunity and Identity Crisis

Meta stands between Apple and Google in AI readiness. The company benefits from a strong content distribution system—Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Quest—which generative AI can enhance by enabling more personalized content and advertising. Its efforts in AI also align with its metaverse vision, as generative tools can create virtual worlds and AR interfaces.

Despite these opportunities, Meta faces significant risks. The attention economy is its battlefield, and LLMs (Large Language Models) are beginning to capture user time in ways that sideline traditional social content. If users spend more time chatting with bots than scrolling through feeds, Meta’s monetization could suffer.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg has shown willingness to make massive bets on future tech—Reality Labs being a case in point. However, his aggressive hiring spree and new leadership appointments in AI suggest a degree of panic. He seems to have realized that Meta’s AI development is behind, and the lack of clear strategic direction has become apparent.

Zuckerberg’s humility in recognizing and reacting to this problem is commendable, and his moves—bringing in AI experts like Alexandr Wang, Nat Friedman, and Daniel Gross—indicate Meta is now pushing harder to catch up.

Microsoft: Still in a Strong Spot, But Fragile Alliances

Microsoft’s AI position has become more complex since its near-ideal standing in early 2023. The company has strong infrastructure (via Azure), but lacks a proprietary model and instead relies heavily on OpenAI, whose strategic independence is growing.

That relationship is becoming strained. OpenAI reportedly pushed for Microsoft to give up certain profit rights and accept its for-profit restructuring, with threats of antitrust action. While Microsoft still holds leverage until their agreement expires in 2030, the partnership has become more volatile.

Although Microsoft’s Bing chatbot (Sydney) generated initial excitement, it failed to gain real traction. Similarly, GitHub Copilot faces rising competition from startups and other model providers, and Microsoft’s own Copilot suite hasn’t demonstrated strong user engagement or revenue—based on available data.

Still, Microsoft’s infrastructure advantage remains substantial. Its deep integration with Nvidia GPUs—unlike Google’s focus on TPUs or Amazon’s commodity compute—makes it well-positioned for scalable, efficient AI deployment.

Microsoft should focus on securing long-term Azure access to OpenAI APIs while diversifying its model partnerships. Investments in xAI (Elon Musk), Mistral, and Meta’s Llama could ensure Microsoft retains access to leading models and isn’t overly reliant on OpenAI.

Despite risks, Azure is thriving, and AI continues to drive its growth. Microsoft 365’s long-term success, however, may depend on how AI affects knowledge work: if AI automates too much of what Microsoft 365 enables, it could undermine its own value proposition.

Amazon: Quietly Building a Flexible, Resilient AI Position

Amazon has quietly strengthened its position over the past two years. Unlike Google or Meta, AI doesn’t threaten its business—it actually enhances it. AWS will benefit from increased compute demand, and Amazon.com could benefit from AI-powered product discovery (though it could also lose if customers are led to non-Amazon options).

Crucially, Amazon has forged a stable and practical AI alliance with Anthropic, a model provider without major consumer ambitions. This avoids the conflict Microsoft faces with OpenAI, allowing AWS to offer strong AI services (via Bedrock) without being overshadowed. Anthropic even appears open to building around AWS’s Trainium chips.

AWS’s strategy focuses on flexibility: its Bedrock platform enables clients to access different models, and its investment in Trainium provides chip-level agility. This approach allows Amazon to adapt to whichever models or hardware dominate in the future.

Although Amazon trails in foundational models and chip design, its scale and neutrality allow it to adapt faster than Google or Microsoft, who are more locked into specific ecosystems.

Additionally, AWS is still the top cloud provider, and most enterprises prefer AI close to their existing data, minimizing migration hassles. Alexa, too, holds potential in a voice-centric AI future, although recent signs suggest progress has been slow.

Final Thoughts: Strategic Trade-offs and Future Bets

Each tech giant faces unique challenges and opportunities in the AI race:

• Apple must break from its tightly integrated model to seize opportunities in AI hardware and services.
• Google needs to safeguard Search while pushing its infrastructure and data advantages into product success.
• Meta must harness generative AI’s upside while protecting its ad-driven attention economy.
• Microsoft must manage a rocky partnership with OpenAI and invest in AI diversity to maintain dominance.
• Amazon is well-positioned to be a flexible, behind-the-scenes AI infrastructure leader.

AI is reshaping every aspect of the tech industry. While no player is perfectly positioned, companies that can adapt to rapid model improvements, unpredictable product dynamics, and shifting partnerships will shape the next tech paradigm.

Reference: https://stratechery.com/2025/checking-in-on-ai-and-the-big-five/

Thank you for your AI interest – please join our mailing list using our Contact Us page and Support Forum Registration page.